
Monitoring Narratives Online
Towards a blueprint
by
Introduction
Access to the tools of mass communication is now widespread. Broadcasting a message to an arbitrary audience is within everyone's reach. It can be done quickly and anonymously. The modern newsroom is multipolar and largely unaccountable. As backdrop, digital literacy and algorithms governing the “who sees what” are still in an embryonic stage. As a result, online forums are plagued with opportunistic and perverse ideologies. Thus far, regulatory bodies and hegemonic social media platforms have failed to deliver adequate safeguards.
This report lays out a practical and complete blueprint to study narratives online. The methodology is elementary to be operationalizable in most contexts. It should be regarded as a skeleton to build upon.
Our dissection begins with the tools and processes required to examine online discourse and profile narratives. Subsequently, we cover how to use the findings to support the countering programme. Finally, we deconceptualize the playbook by providing a detailed account of how we implemented it in Bolsonaro’s Brazil and Ouattara’s third term Ivory Coast.
Our hope is that this exposé brings to light the vulnerabilities of these platforms, strengthens intervention efforts and catalyzes policy making.
Countering
Countering narratives can feel like a sisyphean task (Brandolini's law). Narratives do not have a face, they live in the zeitgeist and trying to censor often leads to the Streisand effect. Only a holistic approach, requiring the benevolent involvement and collaboration of all stakeholders (i.e. government, media, civil society, activists, population), can lead to a healthy information space.
Interventions
- Baseline resilience to target narratives is strengthened through promotion of better digital practices (critical thinking, sources verification, ...)
- Addressing the narratives through your own media campaigns. Broadcast content that contains clear calls to actions – viewers should feel compelled to customize, embody and spread the message.
- Engaging with credible influencers to share the content
- Social media platforms use a combination of artificial intelligence, human reviews, reports from users and trusted partners to detect and remove fake/inauthentic accounts and hateful narratives. Initiating the process and getting the "trusted" partner status is a worthwhile pursuit, as your findings will be acted on faster.
[ Preventive Care ]
[ Easing of symptoms ]
- Punctually and transparently communicate any suspect narratives to all stakeholders
- Incentive alignment so that every stakeholder equally feels the cost of a toxic information ecosystem and the benefit of productive information ecosystem
- Resources should be deployed to mend affected communities
- Thought leaders should be held accountable, paired with surgical and temporary banning of accounts
[ Curative care ]
[ Palliative care ]
Mass communication
As described above, central to fighting narratives is the production of counter media campaigns. Getting a message in front of the masses can be done through many channels.

Traditional Media
Newspapers
Magazines
Billboards
Radio
Broadcast TV
Direct paper mail

Digital Media
Online advertising
Search engines
Social media
Video streaming services
Websites
Choosing the adequate channel, or combination of channels, depends on a variety of factors – cost, demographic, reach, targetability, credibility, measurability, complexity, and impact.
Best Practice Principles
Four media-agnostic principles should guide the content creation and publishing process of an exemplar campaign.

Credibility
Source, Vehicle, Production

Shareability
Network feels compelled to share the content

Targeted
Geography, Narrative, Vernacular, Platform

Repetition
Re-post to reach all potential users
Packaging
People click on the packaging not the content. A title, description, and image is your bait. Make it enticing.

Example of a thumbnail
Boosting
Many platforms provide “amplification-as-a-service” to increase the reach of your content. However, it should be used judiciously. The basic rules are outlined below. Step #4 should only occur if high reach is already achieved organically. If it is, set the boosting parameters to target the audience that resonated with the content.

Step #1
Creation of exemplar multimedia content

Step #2
Publish on pages you administer

Step #3
Share through influencers, public and private groups

Step #4
Boost content
Measuring Engagement
Measuring listenership, viewership or readership is media specific. On digital media, the interactions of a user with a piece of content can be recorded through a range of descriptive signals.

Views
Captures the IP address and browser information each time a visitor loads the page

Scrolling
Captures the scroll distance and speed of each visitor

Outbound clicks
Captures an outbound click event each time a visitor clicks a link that leads them away from the page

Video engagement
Captures video play, progress, and complete events as visitors view embedded videos

File Downloads
Captures a file download event each time a file link is clicked

Site search
Captures the query parameter each time a visitor performs a search on your site
Social media platforms, where you will distribute your content, provide an additional level of insight into the sentiment of visitors.

Facebook's Interaction Dashboard
Furthermore, the flow of visitors should be compartmentalized by dispersing URLs with different query parameters. This strategy allows for counterfactual conjecturing.
https://website.com?source_id=from-whatsapp
https://website.com?source_id=from-facebook
https://website.com?source_id=from-twitter